Courtenay’s Substack

Courtenay’s Substack

The Technocratic Unconscious

From Energy Certificates to Universal High Income: A Political-Economic Genealogy

Courtenay Turner's avatar
Courtenay Turner
Apr 18, 2026
∙ Paid
A 1930s Technocracy Incorporated Energy Certificate, denominated 1,000 ergs, printed on aged cream paper with engraved borders and the organization's circular Monad emblem at center.
An Energy Certificate of the type proposed by Technocracy Incorporated, c. 1933. The scheme was never implemented.
X avatar for @elonmusk
Elon Musk@elonmusk
Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.
4:05 AM · Apr 17, 2026 · 62.3M Views

44.4K Replies · 21.6K Reposts · 186K Likes

A note for regular readers (and watchers of my podcasts): "sociotechnical & cybernetic organism" recurs below as an analytic frame I've been developing across earlier essays on this Substack.

The ideological genealogy of Elon Musk’s proposed “Universal High Income” remains conspicuously underexamined in contemporary discourse. Musk’s maternal grandfather, Joshua N. Haldeman, served as a principal organizer of Technocracy Incorporated’s Canadian operations during the 1930s — a techno-rationalist movement that sought to abolish the price system entirely, replacing monetary exchange with energy certificates: universally distributed allotments calibrated to continental energy production, allocated to every citizen irrespective of employment status, and administered by a technocratic governing body of engineers — a so-called Technate — entirely insulated from democratic politics and market mechanisms.

The movement’s trajectory in Canada was abruptly curtailed when the federal government banned Technocracy Inc. at the outset of the Second World War under the Defence of Canada Regulations, citing its opposition to conscription and perceived subversive character, including its authoritarian, anti-democratic structure. The group's public posture was anti-communist and framed as patriotic, though Technocracy's uniformed organization, stylized salutes, and opposition to parliamentary democracy drew contemporary comparisons to fascism — comparisons later reinforced by Haldeman's son-in-law Errol Musk, who claimed in 2024 that Haldeman had sympathized with Nazi Germany during the war. Subsequently, he redirected his political energies toward the leadership of the Social Credit Party in Saskatchewan — a parallel reform tradition premised on monetary dividends and the redistribution of credit to citizens as a function of aggregate social productivity, which itself faced accusations of antisemitic conspiracy theories in certain organizational circles.

Black-and-white photograph of a sparsely attended Technocracy Inc. meeting in a municipal hall, 1930s. A speaker stands at a lectern beside a hand-drawn flow diagram of continental energy production.
A Technocracy Inc. public meeting, Canadian Section, mid-1930s. The organization was banned under the Defence of Canada Regulations in 1940
User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Courtenay Turner.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Courtenay Turner · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture