Peter Thiel's Shadow Empire, Musk's Accelerationist Nightmare, & Yarvin's Dictator Reboot – How AI, Tokenized Tyranny, & Hegelian Dialectics Forge the Antichrist System in Battle for Humanity's Soul!
Does anyone recall the Ring of Power: Empire of the City docuseries by a Grace Powers from early conspiratorial days? She had a sequel to it, The Zion King, chiefly about Prince William going to be the Antichrist. There's a book by Jewish-to-Christian convert Tim Cohen, entitled 'The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea' about the heraldry and other portends pointing to then Prince, now King Charles being the AC. I never hear about the House of Windsor (formerly Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) being promoted as this eschatological figure in the alternative media, or even Christian alt-media personalities, or the British royal family discussed very much at all for that matter. If there was an End Times betting pool, I'd put my $ on William, due to the convincing arguments put forward by Powers and a few others with a similar conclusion, but I'm not overly invested in this proposition. Just thought I'd float the idea or theory in the comment section:
It seems as if the new talking point, post Thiel's new 'Antichrist' interview comments have many folks in the alternative sphere looking at A.I. in fulfilling this role or prophetic archetype. Isn't the Antichrist supposed to be able to make a statue move in the 'holy of holies' in the Third Temple, as a form of sign and wonder to his followers (the Abomination of the Desolation, et cetera)? If that's not a purely denomically-fullfilled, one could see how that could at least by advanced tech of some kind...
Anyhow, kudos for guesting on Jay's show, Courtenay. One day I hope he can explain Orthodox apologetics for me that is comprehensible for the layperson.
One thing about the fake libertarianism in all this is the systematic misrepresentation of Hoppean thought.
In Hoppe's system of "one thousand Liechtensteins" it is very important that the "monarch" has to be easy to remove from power.
A second idea that is underplayed, or even censored, is the idea that most people must not spend significant time of their lives occupied by politics, government, war, or general economic planning. Those functions are delegated to the Monarch, who has both skin in the game and a low-time preference. In this regard, Hoppe's system shares some values with the social order that emerges from the Christian Church. And, although none of that is real anarchism of any type, and it is more republican than monarchical (in the pre-enlightment era senses of republic and monarchy), we can see clearly the differences from what Yarvin's system proposes: Yarvin's Monarchism requires extreme centralization and protection to make the Monarch impossible to topple. His Monarchist system also practically destroys the principle of division of labor, because it seems to force each citizen to do everything in isolation and under license, and it forces information overload where individuals cannot choose their own interest to spend any time they have free, and it also forces a synagoge-style participation in the system. Non-participation means social death.
This variant of Technocracy is a total government by Judges and Temple workers, under a figure-head monarch that amounts to nothing. It's so Britannic and hermaphroditic! UGH!
It is very different from what Hoppe proposed, which requires a different critique. In particular, Hoppe is very skeptical about the idea of "Human Nature" and "Natural Law." That is one possible entry point to debate Hoppe's social system, which is obviously secular, by the way.
Who would've thunk that the make-believe autism of the Millennials Anarchists would be the unmovable obstacle blocking Game B's democratic totalitarianism. The Technocrats have lost!
Game B wiki is 100% neo-masonic balderdash.
For example "How can you move forward?
Many ways were suggested to move forward without an understanding of the specific context. Jordan Hall provides these meta-principles:
WHAT DOES COHERENCE EVEN MEAN? BY APIS I SWEAR, THESE PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN SURVIVE A SMALL PORTION OF BREAD WITHOUT GETTING A FULL-BODY RASH!!! DON'T EVEN TALK ABOUT CIVILIZATION IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND CEREAL!!! I'M CEREAL!!!
Does anyone recall the Ring of Power: Empire of the City docuseries by a Grace Powers from early conspiratorial days? She had a sequel to it, The Zion King, chiefly about Prince William going to be the Antichrist. There's a book by Jewish-to-Christian convert Tim Cohen, entitled 'The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea' about the heraldry and other portends pointing to then Prince, now King Charles being the AC. I never hear about the House of Windsor (formerly Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) being promoted as this eschatological figure in the alternative media, or even Christian alt-media personalities, or the British royal family discussed very much at all for that matter. If there was an End Times betting pool, I'd put my $ on William, due to the convincing arguments put forward by Powers and a few others with a similar conclusion, but I'm not overly invested in this proposition. Just thought I'd float the idea or theory in the comment section:
Ring of Power series: https://archive.org/embed/ring-of-power-empire-of-the-city-fair-use-educational.-must-see-film&playlist=1&autoplay=1
Grace Powers Ring of Power II - The Zion King 2012
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZnVv8a0VttrN
It seems as if the new talking point, post Thiel's new 'Antichrist' interview comments have many folks in the alternative sphere looking at A.I. in fulfilling this role or prophetic archetype. Isn't the Antichrist supposed to be able to make a statue move in the 'holy of holies' in the Third Temple, as a form of sign and wonder to his followers (the Abomination of the Desolation, et cetera)? If that's not a purely denomically-fullfilled, one could see how that could at least by advanced tech of some kind...
Anyhow, kudos for guesting on Jay's show, Courtenay. One day I hope he can explain Orthodox apologetics for me that is comprehensible for the layperson.
One thing about the fake libertarianism in all this is the systematic misrepresentation of Hoppean thought.
In Hoppe's system of "one thousand Liechtensteins" it is very important that the "monarch" has to be easy to remove from power.
A second idea that is underplayed, or even censored, is the idea that most people must not spend significant time of their lives occupied by politics, government, war, or general economic planning. Those functions are delegated to the Monarch, who has both skin in the game and a low-time preference. In this regard, Hoppe's system shares some values with the social order that emerges from the Christian Church. And, although none of that is real anarchism of any type, and it is more republican than monarchical (in the pre-enlightment era senses of republic and monarchy), we can see clearly the differences from what Yarvin's system proposes: Yarvin's Monarchism requires extreme centralization and protection to make the Monarch impossible to topple. His Monarchist system also practically destroys the principle of division of labor, because it seems to force each citizen to do everything in isolation and under license, and it forces information overload where individuals cannot choose their own interest to spend any time they have free, and it also forces a synagoge-style participation in the system. Non-participation means social death.
This variant of Technocracy is a total government by Judges and Temple workers, under a figure-head monarch that amounts to nothing. It's so Britannic and hermaphroditic! UGH!
It is very different from what Hoppe proposed, which requires a different critique. In particular, Hoppe is very skeptical about the idea of "Human Nature" and "Natural Law." That is one possible entry point to debate Hoppe's social system, which is obviously secular, by the way.
Who would've thunk that the make-believe autism of the Millennials Anarchists would be the unmovable obstacle blocking Game B's democratic totalitarianism. The Technocrats have lost!
Game B wiki is 100% neo-masonic balderdash.
For example "How can you move forward?
Many ways were suggested to move forward without an understanding of the specific context. Jordan Hall provides these meta-principles:
Understand the truth
Develop your sovereignty
Develop the right relationship
Develop coherence with others"
https://www.gameb.wiki/index.php?title=Game_B
WHAT DOES COHERENCE EVEN MEAN? BY APIS I SWEAR, THESE PEOPLE CAN'T EVEN SURVIVE A SMALL PORTION OF BREAD WITHOUT GETTING A FULL-BODY RASH!!! DON'T EVEN TALK ABOUT CIVILIZATION IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND CEREAL!!! I'M CEREAL!!!